Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Here we quantitatively characterize two common homogenization strategies in the analysis of tissue proteomes: classical manual homogenization (MH) and an automated frozen disruption (AFD) technique. In a variety of tissues, many proteins were more efficiently extracted, resolved and detected, with high reproducibility after AFD, amounting to as much as 2% of the total resolved proteome. The benefits of AFD over MH are 2-fold: (1) AFD yields a much more thorough homogenate than MH; and (2) as a deep frozen alternative, AFD maintains a level of biological complexity that is not retained during MH. Thus, AFD coupled with refined 2DE protocols and Sypro Ruby staining yields quantitative proteomic analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Butt et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: