Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rhodium chelate complexes of the title diphosphines, (( S )- 5, n = 0; ( S )- 6, n /R = 1/H; ( S Re S C )- and ( S Re R C )- 7, n /R = 1/Ph), are catalyst precursors (1.0 mol %, 24−26 °C) for additions of Ph 2 SiH 2 to the ketones PhCOCH 2 R (R = H, CH 3, CH 2 CH 3, CH 2 CH 2 Cl; 93−77% conversions). Hydrolyses give the alcohols ( R )-HOCH(Ph)CH 2 R in 83−60% isolated yields; configurations correlate with the relative rhenium configurations of the catalysts. The ee values with ( S )- 6 (63/62/60/92%) exceed those of ( S )- 5 (44/38/47/48%); ee values of ( S Re R C )- 7 (41/46/62/58%) are higher than those of the diastereomer ( S Re S C )- 7 (23/11/15/35%). The alkenes ( Z )-RCH C(NHCOCH 3 )CO 2 R‘ (R/R‘ = H/H, Ph/H, Ph/CH 3 ) and H 2 (1 atm) react in the presence of ( S Re S C )- and ( S Re R C )- 7 (0.5 mol %, 30 °C) to give the protected amino acids RCH 2 CH(NHCOCH 3 )CO 2 R‘ in 85−92% yields. The ee values with ( S Re S C )- 7 (37/62/61%) are lower than those found earlier for ( S )- 6 (62/72/65%) or ( S )- 5 (92/93/88%), with S enantiomers dominant in all cases. Surprisingly, ( S Re R C )- 7 gave much higher ee values (93/94/97%), but with R enantiomers dominant. Hence, the carbon stereocenter of 7 controls the product configuration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kromm et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: