Key result
The Pro12Ala variant of the PPARG gene was a significant risk factor for edema in type 2 diabetic patients treated with ragaglitazar (HR 4.42, P=0.0081).
Why the study?
Does the Pro12Ala variant of the PPARG gene increase the risk of edema in type 2 diabetic patients treated with the PPARalpha/gamma agonist ragaglitazar?
RCT (n=345)
randomized
Does the Pro12Ala variant of the PPARG gene increase the risk of edema in type 2 diabetic patients treated with the PPARalpha/gamma agonist ragaglitazar?
Hazard Ratio: 4.42
p-value: p=0.0081
The Pro12Ala variant of the PPARG gene is a significant risk factor for edema in type 2 diabetic patients treated with PPARgamma agonists, suggesting genetic testing could help identify patients at high risk for this adverse effect.
Pro12Ala carriers may face higher edema risk on ragaglitazar; hypothesis-generating for PPARG genotyping in PPARgamma agonist safety.
CONTEXT: Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs)-gamma by thiazolidinediones (pioglitazone, rosiglitazone) and dual-acting PPARalpha/gamma agonists (pargluva, ragaglitazar) is a widely used pharmacological principle to treat insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Clinically, however, fluid retention and edema are worrying side effects with these drugs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to investigate any variation in the PPARG and PPARA genes associated with the risk of fluid retention and development of peripheral edema in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with the dual-acting PPARalpha/gamma agonist ragaglitazar. DESIGN: Single-nucleotide polymorphism and haplotype analyses of the PPARA and PPARG genes were performed on DNA obtained from 345 type 2 diabetic patients randomized to 26-wk monotherapy with the dual-acting PPARalpha/gamma agonist ragaglitazar. RESULTS: At 26 wk, edema was recorded in 48 of the patients (14%) treated with ragaglitazar, and Cox regression analyses identified the common Pro12Ala variant of the PPARG gene as biologically the most important risk factor (hazard ratio 4.42, P = 0.0081) for edema. Other risk factors included female gender (hazard ratio 3.34, P = 0.0005) and weight change during treatment (hazard ratio 1.20, P = 0.0017). CONCLUSIONS: A population-attributable risk of approximately 50% for the Pro12Pro genotype indicates that testing for the Pro12Ala of the PPARG gene in addition to the already identified clinical risk factors may become a useful tool to further reduce the risk of PPARgamma agonist-induced fluid retention and edema in patients with type 2 diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hansen et al. (2006) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes (n=345). Pro12Ala variant of the PPARG gene vs. Pro12Pro genotype was evaluated on Edema (HR 4.42, p=0.0081). The Pro12Ala variant of the PPARG gene was a significant risk factor for edema in type 2 diabetic patients treated with ragaglitazar (HR 4.42, P=0.0081).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: