Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Anti-estrogen resistance is a major clinical problem in the treatment of breast cancer. In this study, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis, a rapid and direct way to monitor conformational changes of estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) upon anti-estrogen binding, was used to characterize resistance to anti-estrogens. Nine different anti-estrogens all induced a rapid FRET response within minutes after the compounds have liganded to ERalpha in live cells, corresponding to an inactive conformation of the ERalpha. Phosphorylation of Ser(305) and/or Ser(236) of ERalpha by protein kinase A (PKA) and of Ser(118) by mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) influenced the FRET response differently for the various anti-estrogens. PKA and MAPK are both associated with resistance to anti-estrogens in breast cancer patients. Their respective actions can result in seven different combinations of phospho-modifications in ERalpha where the FRET effects of particular anti-estrogen(s) are nullified. The FRET response provided information on the activity of ERalpha under the various anti-estrogen conditions as measured in a traditional reporter assay. Tamoxifen and EM-652 were the most sensitive to kinase activities, whereas ICI-182,780 (Fulvestrant) and ICI-164,384 were the most stringent. The different responses of anti-estrogens to the various combinations of phospho-modifications in ERalpha elucidate why certain anti-estrogens are more prone than others to develop resistance. These data provide new insights into the mechanism of action of anti-hormones and are critical for selection of the correct individual patient-based endocrine therapy in breast cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zwart et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: