Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The shear strength of bonds between isotactic polypropylene and cellophane, formed under standard conditions, has beer studied as a function of cooling rates, following bond formation, and after ageing at temperatures up to 90°C. Rapid cooling produced cohesively failing bonds with shear strengths above 20 kg/em2. Weak, adhesively failing joints were produced under slow‐cooling conditions. Strong bonds deteriorated when joints were aged at temperatures above 50°C, but further improvement in bond strength was observed upon ageing at lower temperatures. Experimental observations were consistent with the development of smectic structure in the polypropylene upon rapid cooling; a tendency for transcrystallization in slow‐cooled joints was offset by the presence of weak boundary layers in the interface. Ageing produced further development of weak boundary layers and a transition from smectic to monoclinic crystallization in polypropylene. At higher ageing temperatures, the former effect seemed dominant; at lower temperatures, the structural change was assumed responsible for the observed improvement in bond strength.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bialski et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: