Key result
Rotavirus genotyping of 126 strains from South Indian children with acute diarrhea identified G types in 80% and P types in 61%, with G1:P1A[8] and G1:P1B[4] being the most common combinations.
Observational (n=126)
No
The study identified the prevalent G and P genotypes of rotavirus in South Indian children with acute diarrhea between 1995 and 1998, noting the emergence of G9 strains.
Genotype data from 1990s South India may guide historical comparisons; leaves open current strain distribution and vaccine effectiveness.
The distribution of VP7 (G-) and VP4 (P-) genotypes among 126 rotavirus strains from South Indian children, < 5 years of age and with acute diarrhoea, presenting to a single hospital during the months to November and December, from 1995 to 1998, was studied. Multiplex hemi-nested G- and P-typing polymerase chain reactions determined 101 (80%) G types and 78 (61%) P types, respectively. In order of frequency, the commonest G types were G1, G4, G2, G9, G3, and G8, and P types were P1B[4], P1A[8], and P2A[6] and the most common G:P combinations were G1:P1A[8], G1:P1B[4], G2P1B[4] and G4:P1A[8]. G1, G2, and G4 types were seen in all years. The single G3 isolate was seen in 1998. The single G8 isolate and the 5 G9 isolates were seen in 1997, after a period of heavy rain. Sequence analysis showed that the G8 isolate was related most closely to the bovine strain A5, and the G9 strains were distinct from the nonpathogenic Indian isolate 116E and similar to G9s isolated in Mysore and the United Kingdom described previously.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2002) conducted an observational in acute diarrhea (n=126). Rotavirus genotypes was evaluated on Distribution of VP7 (G-) and VP4 (P-) genotypes. Rotavirus genotyping of 126 strains from South Indian children with acute diarrhea identified G types in 80% and P types in 61%, with G1:P1A[8] and G1:P1B[4] being the most common combinations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: