Key result
Among 227 participants, mental health staff demonstrated the highest knowledge and willingness to undergo ECT, followed by family members, while patients with serious mental illness showed the least.
Why the study?
Electroconvulsive therapy has been argued to be underused due to a lack of knowledge and stigmatic negative attitudes toward it.
How do knowledge, attitudes, and willingness to undergo electroconvulsive therapy differ among mental health staff, patients with serious mental illness, and their family members?
Cross-Sectional (n=227)
How do knowledge, attitudes, and willingness to undergo electroconvulsive therapy differ among mental health staff, patients with serious mental illness, and their family members?
Knowledge, attitudes, and willingness to undergo ECT vary significantly among stakeholders, with patients having the least knowledge and most negative attitudes compared to staff and family members.
Targeted education may boost ECT acceptance among patients and families; leaves open whether knowledge gains increase utilization in practice.
Objectives: It has been argued that electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is underused because of lack of knowledge and stigmatic negative attitudes toward it.Methods: The present study assessed and compared knowledge of attitudes toward, and willingness to undergo ECT among 227 participants from three groups: mental health staff members (N = 104), people with serious mental illness (SMI) (N = 61), and family members of people with SMI (N = 62). Participants completed questionnaires, which assessed knowledge about and attitude toward ECT as well as willingness to be treated with ECT.Results: Results showed staff members as most knowledgeable, with most positive attitudes, and most willing to undergo ECT. Family members showed less knowledge, a less positive attitude, and a lower degree of willingness, whereas people with SMI demonstrated the least in all three variables.Conclusions: Results suggest that attitudes toward and willingness to undergo ECT are influenced by the degree of direct impact and personal relevance as well as knowledge about it and attitudes toward it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rafoul et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Serious mental illness (n=227). Participant group (staff, SMI patients, family) vs. Between-group comparison was evaluated on Knowledge about, attitude toward, and willingness to undergo ECT. Among 227 participants, mental health staff demonstrated the highest knowledge and willingness to undergo ECT, followed by family members, while patients with serious mental illness showed the least.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: