Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The energy difference between the “up-down” and “lateral” H 2 PO 4 configurations in the Slater model is interpreted as a difference in the molecular energies when they are fictitiously isolated while maintaining their configurations in the crystal. This version of the Slater model is shown to be satisfactory for explaining the observed correlation between the transition temperature and the covalent OH(D) bond length of the hydrogen bond OH(D)…O with a reasonable quantitative agreement. It is pointed out that the present model is not applicable to cases where the transition temperatures are very low.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Motida et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: