Key result
Supplemental oxygen corrected oxygen desaturation and minimized associated haemodynamic changes in sedated patients undergoing elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Why the study?
Does supplemental oxygen prevent oxygen desaturation in patients undergoing elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy?
RCT (n=212)
Randomized
Does supplemental oxygen prevent oxygen desaturation in patients undergoing elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy?
Supplemental oxygen should be administered during conscious sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to prevent oxygen desaturation and minimize haemodynamic changes.
Supports routine supplemental oxygen in sedated upper GI endoscopy; confirms RCT benefit on desaturation and hemodynamics.
A total of 212 patients undergoing elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were prospectively studied. They were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: (I) sedation with no supplemental oxygen; (II) no sedation and no oxygen supplementation; (III) sedation and supplemental oxygen; and (IV) no sedation but supplemental oxygen. Oxygen desaturation occurred in all the groups except group IV and was worsened by sedation. Supplemental oxygen corrected the desaturation in the sedated patients and minimized the associated haemodynamic changes. The duration of the endoscopy procedure was shortest in patients who were sedated and given supplemental oxygen. It can be concluded that during conscious sedation for upper gastro-intestinal endoscopy, supplemental oxygen should be given and continued during the postendoscopy period to prevent oxygen desaturation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
al-Qorain et al. (1993) conducted an RCT in Elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (n=212). Supplemental oxygen vs. No supplemental oxygen was evaluated on Oxygen desaturation. Supplemental oxygen corrected oxygen desaturation and minimized associated haemodynamic changes in sedated patients undergoing elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: