Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An experimental program has been carried out to study the performance of partially grouted, nominally reinforced (PG-NR) concrete block structural walls under in-plane seismic loading on a shake table. Five reduced-scale structural walls were constructed and tested under scaled versions of the 1940 El Centro, California earthquake, using its N-S component record with a constant axial compression load that represented a single-story building. The test walls were grouped into three categories. Type I and III walls had reinforcement at the wall end cells only, with vertical reinforcement ratios of 0.07 and 0.12%, respectively, based on the gross cross-sectional area of the walls. Type II walls were similar to Type I walls, but with an additional reinforcement bar located midlength of the wall with a vertical reinforcement ratio of 0.10%, also based on the gross cross-sectional area of the wall. The experimental results were documented and discussed with respect to wall lateral load capacity, stiffness degradation, period shift, displacement ductility levels attained, and relevant seismic-force reduction factors. The test results showed that PG-NR masonry walls can comprise a ductile seismic force-resisting system. Subsequently, PG-NR masonry walls have the potential to bridge the gap between unreinforced and reinforced masonry systems. The use of PG-NR masonry also results in a reduced cost compared with traditional reinforced masonry systems used in seismic zones that are typically fully grouted within the plastic hinge zones and require higher reinforcement ratios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kasparik et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: