Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect on immunization levels of retrospective written feedback to residents regarding missed immunization opportunities. DESIGN: Randomized trial with control group. SETTING: Pediatric resident continuity clinic in an urban hospital-based primary care clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two postgraduate level 2 and postgraduate level 3 pediatric residents. INTERVENTION: Monthly retrospective written feedback mailed to residents detailing their missed immunization opportunities and appointment failure rates over a 12-month period beginning in February 1997. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The immunization level of 2-year-old children in the resident clinic was the main outcome of interest. Secondary outcomes included missed immunization opportunity rates and appointment failure rates. RESULTS: Postintervention immunization levels were 71.4% (95% confidence limits [CLs]: 63.2%, 78.7%) for patients from the intervention group and 68.5% (95% CLs: 60.8%, 75.4%) for patients from the control group. The immunization level for patients of both groups who had fewer than 2 visits during the second year of life was 47.2% (95% CLs: 38.2%, 56.3%). This compares with an immunization level of 78.1% (95% CLs: 66.0%, 87.5%) for patients from both groups who had 2 visits during the second year of life, and with an immunization level of 88.2% (95% CLs: 81.0%, 93.4%) for patients of both groups who had more than 2 visits during the second year of life (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this setting, written retrospective feedback to residents was an ineffective strategy for improving immunization levels. Adequate follow-up during the second year of life is critical in achieving high immunization levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rust et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: