Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Methods for estimating radiation dose using biological indicators have made rapid progress during recent years. Chromosome analysis in lymphocytes still plays a central role, but it is no longer the only quantitative system in biological dosimetry. The best approach seems to be to combine several of the assays exploiting their specific advantages: the high sensitivity in the case of dicentrics in lymphocytes (starting at about 0.05 Gy low-LET radiation), the broad dose range covered by the electron spin resonance technique (0.5-100 Gy), the possibility of identifying the localization of partial-body exposure when determining hair diameter, and the individual prognostic information obtained from changes in the frequency of blood cells after exposures exceeding about 1 Gy. In specific situations other methods may replace or supplement these indicators for radiation damage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Müller et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: