Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This investigation explores the flow over a turret atM1 0:4 and ReD 2:4 10 using both hybrid Reynoldsaveraged Navier–Stokes/implicit large-eddy simulation (RANS/ILES) and k-based unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) simulations. Additional hybrid RANS/ILES simulations were performed to compare the effectiveness of two steady-suction flow control approaches. The hybrid RANS/ILES computations were obtained using awell-validated high-orderNavier–Stokes flow solver employing a fourth-order compact spatial discretization in conjunction with a sixth-order low-pass spatial filter. The URANS simulations were performed using a secondorder version of the flow solver and kturbulence model. The turret configuration consisted of a half-foot radius hemisphere atop a 4.5-in.-tall circular cylinder base. Both steady suction through a slot and a leeward porous turret shell were explored as forms of flow control. Time-mean hybrid RANS/ILES results, obtained on a 23 10-point mesh, compared reasonably well to experimental pressure coefficient and velocity profiles for the baseline flow. The separation angle was predicted to within 3 deg of experimental observations. The instantaneous hybrid RANS/ILES solutions display complex three-dimensional flow phenomena in the wake of the turret that the kURANS model was unable to resolve. Both steady-suction flow control approaches successfully attached the flow over most the turret dome and significantly reduced the size of the wake.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morgan et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: