Key result
Erector spinae plane (ESP) block demonstrated superiority in postoperative pain control compared to TAP block at 6 and 12 hours after bariatric surgery (p=0.032 and p=0.010, respectively).
Why the study?
Thoracic epidural analgesia placement can be difficult in laparoscopic bariatric surgery, prompting evaluation of erector spinae plane block compared with transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain.
Does erector spinae plane block improve postoperative pain control compared to transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery?
RCT (n=51)
Does erector spinae plane block improve postoperative pain control compared to transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery?
p-value: p=0.032 and 0.010
Erector spinae plane block provides superior postoperative pain control from 6 to 12 hours compared to transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
ESP may serve as an alternative to TAP for post-bariatric analgesia; leaves open optimal choice pending larger randomized trials.
Background: In laparoscopic bariatric surgery the enhanced recovery after surgery pathway is proven beneficial for the rapid postoperative recovery of patients. Thoracic epidural analgesia is considered the gold standard for this type of surgery, but the placement of a thoracic epidural catheter can be difficult sometimes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of erector spinae plane (ESP) block compared with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in the management of postoperative pain for laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Materials and Methods: Fifty-one patients were divided into two groups and received TAP block or ESP block and the primary outcome for this study was the assessment of postoperative pain intensity expressed as numeric rating scale (NRS) at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. Results: There was no statistical difference between ESP group and TAP group for NRS at the first hour (p = 0.101), whereas postoperative pain scores were lower in the ESP group compared with TAP group from 6 and 12 h after surgery (p = 0.032 and p = 0.010) respectively. Conclusion: The study showed a statistically significant superiority in postoperative pain control of ESP block from the 6th to the 12th-hour postoperative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bagaphou et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Laparoscopic bariatric surgery (n=51). Erector spinae plane (ESP) block vs. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block was evaluated on Postoperative pain intensity expressed as numeric rating scale (NRS) at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h (p=0.032 and 0.010). Erector spinae plane (ESP) block demonstrated superiority in postoperative pain control compared to TAP block at 6 and 12 hours after bariatric surgery (p=0.032 and p=0.010, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: