Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Crystal structures of six binary salts involving aromatic amines as cations and hydrogen tartrates as anions are presented. The materials are 2,6-xylidinium- l -monohydrogen tartrate monohydrate, C 12 H 18 O 6.5 N, P 22 1 2 1, a = 7.283(2) Å, b = 17.030(2) Å, c = 22.196(2) Å, Z = 8; 2,6-xylidinium- d -dibenzoyl monohydrogen tartrate, C 26 H 25 O 8 N, P 2 1, a = 7.906(1) Å, b = 24.757(1) Å, c = 13.166(1) Å, β = 105.01(1)°, Z = 4; 2,3-xylidinium- d -dibenzoyl monohydrogen tartrate monohydrate, C 26 H 26 O 8.5 N, P 2 1, a = 7.837(1) Å, b = 24.488(1) Å, c = 13.763(1) Å, β = 105.69(1)°, Z = 4; 2-toluidinium- d -dibenzoyl monohydrogen tartrate, C 25 H 23 O 8 N, P 2 1 2 1 2 1, a = 13.553(2) Å, b = 15.869(3) Å, c = 22.123(2) Å, Z = 8; 3-toluidinium- d -dibenzoyl monohydrogen tartrate (1:1), C 25 H 23 O 8 N, P 1, a = 7.916(3) Å, b = 11.467(6) Å, c = 14.203(8) Å, α = 96.44(4)°, β = 98.20(5)°, = 110.55(5)°, Z = 2; 3-toluidinium- d -dibenzoyl tartrate dihydrate (1:2), C 32 H 36 O 10 N, P 1, a = 7.828(3) Å, b = 8.233(1) Å, c = 24.888(8) Å, α = 93.98°, β = 94.58(3)°, = 89.99(2)°, Z = 2. An analysis of the hydrogen-bonding schemes in terms of crystal packing, stoichiometric variations, and substitutional variations in these materials provides insights to design hydrogen-bonded networks directed toward the engineering of crystalline nonlinear optical materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kadirvelraj et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: