Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the survival impact of lymphadenectomy in patients diagnosed with uterine clear cell cancer (UCCC). METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of UCCC were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from 1988 to 2007. Only surgically treated patients were included. Statistical analysis using Student t-test, Kaplan-Meier survival methods, and Cox proportional hazard regression were performed. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred eighty-five patients met the inclusion criteria; 955 patients (68.9%) underwent lymphadenectomy. Older patients (≥65) were less likely to undergo lymphadenectomy compared with their younger cohorts (64.3% vs. 75.9%, p<0.001). The prevalence of nodal metastasis was 24.8%. Out of 724 women who had disease clinically confined to the uterus and underwent lymphadenectomy, 123 (17%) were found to have nodal metastasis. Lymphadenectomy was associated with improved survival. Patients who underwent lymphadenectomy were 39% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.72; p<0.001) less likely to die than patient who did not have the procedure. Moreover, more extensive lymphadenectomy correlated positively with survival. Compared to patients with 0 nodes removed, patients with more extensive lymphadenectomy (1 to 10 and >10 nodes removed) were 32% (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.83; p<0.001) and 47% (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.65; p<0.001) less likely to die, respectively. CONCLUSION: The extent of lymphadenectomy is associated with an improved survival of patients diagnosed with UCCC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahdi et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: