Key result
Among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation not receiving anticoagulants, very elderly patients with a history of major bleeding had a significantly higher annual incidence of MACNE (5.85%) compared to those with paroxysmal AF and prior catheter ablation (1.66%).
Why the study?
Although anticoagulants are indicated for many elderly NVAF patients, some do not receive them, and their characteristics and outcomes are diverse.
Observational (n=2,445)
Yes
Elderly NVAF patients not receiving anticoagulants are a heterogeneous population comprising a lower-risk paroxysmal AF group and a very high-risk elderly group for whom withholding anticoagulation is inappropriate.
BACKGROUND: Although anticoagulants are indicated for many elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), some patients do not receive anticoagulant therapy, whose characteristics and outcomes are diverse. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this sub-analysis of the All Nippon AF In the Elderly (ANAFIE) Registry, the phenotypes of patients who were not receiving anticoagulants at baseline were evaluated by cluster analysis using Ward's linkage hierarchical algorithm. Of 32,275 enrolled patients, 2445 (7.6%) were not receiving anticoagulants. Two clusters were identified: (1) elderly paroxysmal AF (PAF) patients with a high proportion of catheter ablation history (57%) and (2) very elderly patients with a high prevalence of previous major bleeding (43%). Respective mean ages were 80.9 and 84.2 years, mean CHA2DS2-VASc scores were 3.8 and 4.9, PAF prevalences were 100.0% and 31.4%, proportions of patients with catheter ablation history were 21.0% and 7.9%, and proportions of patients with a history of major bleeding were 4.0% and 10.8%. Annual incidence rates were 2.72% and 8.81% for all-cause death, 1.66% and 5.85% for major adverse cardiovascular or neurological events, 1.08% and 3.30% for stroke or systemic embolism, and 0.69% and 1.19% for major bleeding, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of elderly NVAF patients from the ANAFIE Registry who were not receiving anticoagulants, over half had PAF with a high proportion of catheter ablation history and a low incidence of adverse outcomes; for them, non-prescription of anticoagulants may be partially understandable, but they should be carefully monitored regarding AF burden or atrial cardiomyopathy and be adequately anticoagulated when adverse findings are detected. The remaining were very elderly patients with a high prevalence of previous major bleeding and a high incidence of adverse outcomes; for them, non-prescription of anticoagulants is inappropriate because of the high thromboembolic risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration: http://www.umin.ac.jp/; Unique identifier: UMIN000024006.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=2,445). Very elderly with high prevalence of previous major bleeding (Cluster 2) vs. Elderly paroxysmal AF with high proportion of catheter ablation history (Cluster 1) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular or neurological events (MACNE) (p=<0.001). Among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation not receiving anticoagulants, very elderly patients with a history of major bleeding had a significantly higher annual incidence of MACNE (5.85%) compared to those with paroxysmal AF and prior catheter ablation (1.66%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: