Key result
Genetic risk scores based on over 90 risk variants are more effective in risk stratification for coronary artery disease than conventional risk factors and can be determined at birth.
Why the study?
Does a genetic risk score (GRS) improve risk stratification for coronary artery disease compared to conventional risk factors?
Does a genetic risk score (GRS) improve risk stratification for coronary artery disease compared to conventional risk factors?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Genetic risk scores combining multiple inherited risk variants offer a potentially more effective method for CAD risk stratification than conventional risk factors, enabling early primary prevention.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current review is to describe the genetic risk variants that have been discovered predisposing to coronary artery disease (CAD) and how they are utilized to stratify for risk of CAD. RECENT FINDINGS: Over 90 genetic risk variants have been discovered that predispose to risk for CAD. SUMMARY: The total genetic risk burden for CAD is proportional to the number of risk variants inherited and can be combined into a single number referred to as the genetic risk score (GRS). GRS has been utilized in multiple studies and shown to be more effective in risk stratification for CAD than conventional risk factors. There is a major advantage to risk stratification based on the GRS since the risk can be determined at birth or anytime throughout one's lifetime since the individual's DNA does not change. Widespread application of the GRS is likely to enable a paradigm shift in the primary prevention of CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert Roberts (2018) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease (CAD). Genetic risk score (GRS) vs. Conventional risk factors was evaluated on Risk stratification for CAD. Genetic risk scores based on over 90 risk variants are more effective in risk stratification for coronary artery disease than conventional risk factors and can be determined at birth.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: