Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Accounting for electronic polarization effects in biomolecular simulation (by using a polarizable force field) can increase the accuracy of simulation results. However, the use of gas-phase estimates of atomic polarizabilities αi usually leads to overpolarization in condensed-phase systems. In the current work, a combined QM/MM approach has been employed to obtain condensed-phase estimates of atomic polarizabilities for water and methanol (QM) solutes in the presence of (MM) solvents of different polarity. In a next step, the validity of the linear response and isotropy assumptions were evaluated based on the observed condensed-phase distributions of αi values. The observed anisotropy and low average values for the polarizability of methanol's carbon atom in polar solvents was explained in terms of strong solute-solvent interactions involving its adjacent hydroxyl group. Our QM/MM estimates for atomic polarizabilities were found to be close to values used in previously reported polarizable water and methanol models. Using our estimate for αO of methanol, a single set of polarizable force field parameters was obtained that is directly transferable between environments of different polarity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vosmeer et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: