Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents the phonetic description of a three-way phonemic contrast in the medial stops (lenis, fortis, and voiced fortis stops) of a southern dialect of Northern Paiute.Qualitative and quantitative analysis of VOT, closure duration, and voice quality was performed on field recordings of a female speaker from the 1950s.The findings include that: 1) voiced fortis stops are realized phonetically as voiceless unaspirated stops; 2) the difference between fortis and voiced fortis and between voiced fortis and lenis in terms of VOT is subtle; 3) consonantal duration is a robust acoustic characteristic differentiating the three classes of stops; 4) lenis stops are characterized by a smooth VC transition, while fortis stops often exhibit aspiration at the VC juncture, and voiced fortis stops exhibit occasional glottalization at the VC juncture.These findings suggest that the three-way contrast is realized by combination of multiple phonetic properties, particularly the properties that occur at the vowel-consonant boundary rather than the consonantal release. Final featuresEffects in current Numic languages *Series 1 (unmarked)Lenition in all languages *Series 2 (marked as [ ])Fortition in all languages that have series 2 feature *Series 3 (marked as [ ]) Penasalization in Shoshone and Southern Paiute Voiced fortis in SNNP Merged to series 2 in all other languages *Series 4 (marked as [ h ]) (Pre)aspiration in all languages that have series 4 feature * This feature appears only before sonorant-hj, hwTABLE 2 Shoshone morphemes with final features (from Miller 1996)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reiko Kataoka (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: