Key result
Percutaneous mitral valve repair was cost-effective compared to optimal medical treatment in inoperable patients with functional mitral regurgitation, yielding an ICER of €15,533/QALY.
Why the study?
Does percutaneous mitral valve repair improve cost-effectiveness compared to optimal medical treatment in inoperable patients with functional mitral regurgitation and heart failure?
Does percutaneous mitral valve repair improve cost-effectiveness compared to optimal medical treatment in inoperable patients with functional mitral regurgitation and heart failure?
Percutaneous mitral valve repair using the Carillon system is projected to be cost-effective compared to optimal medical therapy in German patients with heart failure and functional mitral regurgitation.
Supports cost-effectiveness modeling for percutaneous repair in inoperable functional MR; leaves open randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: To determine the cost-effectiveness of the percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) using Carillon® Mitral Contour System® (Cardiac Dimensions Inc., Kirkland, WA, USA) in patients with congestive heart failure accompanied by moderate to severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) compared to the prolongation of optimal medical treatment (OMT). METHODS: Cost-utility analysis using a combination of a decision tree and Markov process was performed. The clinical effectiveness was determined based on the results of the Transcatheter Implantation of Carillon Mitral Annuloplasty Device (TITAN) trial. The mean age of the target population was 62 years, 77% of the patients were males, 64% of the patients had severe FMR and all patients had New York Heart Association functional class III. The epidemiological, cost and utility data were derived from the literature. The analysis was performed from the German statutory health insurance perspective over 10-year time horizon. RESULTS: Over 10 years, the total cost was €36,785 in the PMVR arm and €18,944 in the OMT arm. However, PMVR provided additional benefits to patients with an 1.15 incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and an 1.41 incremental life years. The percutaneous procedure was cost-effective in comparison to OMT with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €15,533/QALY. Results were robust in the deterministic sensitivity analysis. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis with a willingness-to-pay threshold of €35,000/QALY, PMVR had a 84 % probability of being cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous mitral valve repair may be cost-effective in inoperable patients with FMR due to heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borisenko et al. (2015) studied Congestive heart failure with moderate to severe functional mitral regurgitation (n=53). Percutaneous mitral valve repair (Carillon Mitral Contour System) vs. Optimal medical treatment was evaluated on Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (ICER €15,533/QALY). Percutaneous mitral valve repair was cost-effective compared to optimal medical treatment in inoperable patients with functional mitral regurgitation, yielding an ICER of €15,533/QALY.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: