Key result
Higher D-dimer linked to ~591% greater odds of left atrial thrombus per standard deviation.
Why the study?
TEE is the reference standard for excluding left atrial thrombus in rheumatic severe mitral stenosis, but its availability is limited in many low-resource settings.
Does D-dimer testing accurately exclude left atrial thrombus in treatment-naïve patients with rheumatic severe mitral stenosis?
Cross-Sectional (n=68)
Single-blind
No
Does D-dimer testing accurately exclude left atrial thrombus in treatment-naïve patients with rheumatic severe mitral stenosis?
Odds Ratio: 6.91 (95% CI 2.72–17.54)
p-value: p=<0.001
D-dimer testing at a threshold of 360.6 ng/mL may serve as a highly sensitive, low-cost rule-out tool for left atrial thrombus in treatment-naïve patients with rheumatic severe mitral stenosis, potentially allowing safe deferral of TEE in resource-limited settings.
Background: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the reference standard for excluding left atrial thrombus (LAT) in rheumatic severe mitral stenosis (SMS), yet its availability is limited in many low-resource settings. A reliable, low-cost strategy to safely defer TEE would have a significant clinical impact. This study evaluated whether D-dimer-based predictive models can accurately exclude newly detected LAT in treatment-naïve patients with rheumatic SMS. Methods: Sixty-eight consecutive patients with rheumatic SMS who were not receiving anticoagulation underwent D-dimer testing, transthoracic echocardiography, and TEE. Associations with LAT were assessed using conventional and Firth-penalized logistic regression. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis with 1,000-bootstrap internal validation. Two composite models were examined: D-dimer combined with atrial fibrillation (AF) and D-dimer combined with mitral valve area (MVA). Results: < 0.001). The optimal D-dimer cut-off (360.6 ng/mL) achieved 100% sensitivity, 71.4% specificity, and an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.935, outperforming the conventional 500 ng/mL threshold (sensitivity 75%). In adjusted models, D-dimer remained a strong independent predictor of LAT (per SD: AOR 6.91; 95% CI 2.72-17.54). Composite models demonstrated similarly high discrimination (AUC 0.933-0.940); adding AF did not improve performance, whereas incorporating MVA increased specificity to 100%. Conclusions: D-dimer may help exclude LAT in treatment-naïve patients with rheumatic SMS. Its potential role in supporting more selective TEE use in resource-limited settings warrants further evaluation in larger prospective multicenter studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Wather et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Rheumatic severe mitral stenosis (n=68). D-dimer testing vs. Lower D-dimer levels was evaluated on Presence of left atrial thrombus (LAT) (AOR 6.91, 95% CI 2.72-17.54, p=<0.001). D-dimer levels were a strong independent predictor of left atrial thrombus (AOR 6.91 per SD increase), with an optimal cut-off of 360.6 ng/mL achieving 100% sensitivity and 71.4% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: