Key result
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction was more prevalent in cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS for refractory ascites than controls (59% vs 35%, P<0.01) and predicted a lack of clinical response.
Why the study?
TIPS exacerbates hyperdynamic circulation and challenges cardiac function, and the incidence and impact of LVDD in cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS for refractory ascites were unclear.
Does left ventricular diastolic dysfunction predict lack of clinical response in cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS for refractory ascites?
Cohort (n=104)
Does left ventricular diastolic dysfunction predict lack of clinical response in cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS for refractory ascites?
Absolute Event Rate: 59% vs 35%
p-value: p=<0.01
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and elevated NT-proBNP are associated with a lack of clinical response to TIPS in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites.
Background and aims Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in cirrhotics are associated with circulatory dysfunction, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and heart failure in stressful conditions. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) exacerbates the hyperdynamic circulation and challenges cardiac function. We evaluated the incidence and the impact of LVDD in cirrhotic candidates to TIPS for refractory ascites. Methods Among 135 patients who underwent TIPS for refractory ascites, 63 cases (child B/C 53/10, Na-model for end-stage liver disease 16.5 ± 0.9) who had 2D-transthoracic-echocardiography with tissue-Doppler-imaging pre-TIPS were retrospectively analysed (group A); in 23 cases cardiac and hormonal assessment before and after TIPS was available. 41 cirrhotics without refractory ascites treated by banding ligation for variceal re-bleeding were used as controls (group B). Results The prevalence of LVDD was higher in group A (59%; 22% with grade ≥2) as compared to group B (35%; 7% with grade ≥2) ( P < 0.01 and P < 0.03). A lack of clinical response to TIPS occurred in 10 patients, all with LVDD ( P < 0.03 vs. no LVDD) and in patients with grade ≥2 LVDD mostly ( P < 0.02 vs. grade 1). Central venous pressure >20 mmHg after TIPS and left ventricular end-diastolic volume at basal were predictors of no response to TIPS ( P = 0.01 and P = 0.004, respectively), which was an independent predictor of death. Elevated levels of NT-proBNP 3 days after TIPS were associated with advanced cardiac dysfunction ( P = 0.005). Conclusion NT-proBNP and careful LVDD investigation are useful to better select patients and to predict clinical response and mortality after TIPS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Venon et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Cirrhosis with refractory ascites (n=104). TIPS candidacy for refractory ascites vs. Banding ligation for variceal re-bleeding was evaluated on Prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) (p=<0.01). Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction was more prevalent in cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS for refractory ascites than controls (59% vs 35%, P<0.01) and predicted a lack of clinical response.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: