Key result
This review evaluates current evidence for cardiac risk assessment in liver transplant candidates and proposes an evidence-based testing algorithm to address gaps in identifying early coronary disease.
Why the study?
Current cardiac screening tests have limited accuracy in end-stage liver disease, leading to wide variation in pretransplant cardiac risk assessment practices across centers.
How should cardiac risk assessment be performed in liver transplant candidates?
How should cardiac risk assessment be performed in liver transplant candidates?
This review proposes an evidence-based testing algorithm for cardiac risk assessment in liver transplant candidates to address current limitations and variations in practice.
Highlights CV monitoring as priority in LT now; extends comorbidity awareness but leaves optimal strategies open.
In the changing landscape of liver transplantation (LT), we are now evaluating older and sicker patients with more cardiovascular comorbidities, and the spectrum of cardiovascular disease is uniquely physiologically impacted by end-stage liver disease. Cardiac complications are now the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in LT recipients, and the pretransplant risk is exacerbated immediately during the transplant operation and continues long term under the umbrella of immunosuppression. Accurate risk estimation of cardiac complications before LT is paramount to guide allocation of limited health care resources and to improve both short-term and long-term clinical outcomes for patients. Current screening and diagnostic testing are limited in their capacity to accurately identify early coronary disease and myocardial dysfunction in persons with end-stage liver disease physiology. Furthermore, a number of testing modalities have not been evaluated in patients with end-stage liver disease. As a result, there is wide variation in cardiac risk assessment practices across transplant centers. In this review, we propose a definition for defining cardiac events in LT, evaluate the current evidence for surgery-related, short-term and long-term cardiac risk assessment in LT candidates, propose an evidence-based testing algorithm, and highlight specific gaps in knowledge and current controversies, identifying areas for future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barman et al. (2020) conducted a review in Liver transplant candidates with end-stage liver disease. Cardiac risk assessment was evaluated. This review evaluates current evidence for cardiac risk assessment in liver transplant candidates and proposes an evidence-based testing algorithm to address gaps in identifying early coronary disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: