Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It was initially an error that led me to develop non-invasive biomarkers of liver diseases [1]. After perforating the gallbladder of a friend in 1990, I wished that one day the assessment of patients with chronic liver disease could be carried out rapidly with noninvasive techniques and without the use of a liver biopsy. My first biomarker had no industrial development [2] but the others thereafter had professional developments, such as FibroTest with 500,000 tests prescribed worldwide in the last 7 years [3]. Twenty years later, it seems that there is little controversy concerning the utility of the most validated biomarkers versus biopsy [4–6]. Over the last 7 years, the opinions of more than 50 leaders from Nid Afdhal [7] to Vlad Ratziu [8] have been published on these biomarkers. From the evidence-based data, I will summarize my understanding of the main points of agreement and disagreement in 2010 and the main priorities for the years ahead.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thierry Poynard (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: