Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of 64-slice coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography in patients treated by orthotopic liver transplantation, and to compare prognostic values of CT angiography and dobutamine stress echocardiography in the same population. METHODS: Eighty-two consecutive patients, without known coronary artery disease, who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation, were included in this study. A CT angiography was performed along with usual explorations including dobutamine stress echography. A one-year minimal follow-up was performed to seek cardiac events. RESULTS: Fifty-two (65.8%) patients underwent a CT angiography. Thirty-seven (71%) were totally normal or showed nonobstructive coronary plaque, six (12%) showed at least one obstructive coronary plaque greater than 50%. Nine (17%) of the examined patients had at least one nonassessable segment. A total of six (7.6%) major cardiac events occurred in a mean-time follow-up of 17.8 ± 12.7 months. CONCLUSION: CT angiography that is normal or with a nonobstructive coronary plaque has a negative predicting value of 95% [0.82-0.99] for major cardiac adverse events, and of 100% [0.91-1] for clinical coronary events in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. The prognostic value of CT angiography was comparable with that of dobutamine stress echography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cassagneau et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: