The effects of humic acids extracted from two commercially‐available products (CP‐A prepared from peat and CP‐B prepared from leonardite) on the growth and mineral nutrition of tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) in hydroponics culture were tested at concentrations of 20 and 50 mg L‐1. Both the humic acids tested stimulated plants growth. The CP‐A stimulated only root growth, especially at 20 mg L‐1 [23% and 22% increase over the control, on fresh weight basis (f.w.b.), and dry weight basis (d.w.b.), respectively]. In contrast, CP‐B showed a positive effect on both shoots and roots, especially at 50 mg L‐1 (shoots: 8% and 9% increase over the control; roots: 18% and 16% increase over the control, on f.w.b. and d.w.b., respectively). Total ion uptake by the plants was affected by the two products. In particular, CP‐A showed an increase in the uptake of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), iron (Fe), and copper (Cu), whereas, CP‐B showed positive effects for N, P, and Fe uptake. The change in the F...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adani et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: