Key result
This protocol describes a planned individual-level meta-analysis using machine learning on 1,544 participants across 22 datasets to identify predictors of responsiveness to cognitive training.
Why the study?
Mixed findings imply that individual differences and training characteristics may interact to moderate cognitive training efficacy for enhancing well-being.
Does personalized cognitive training improve well-being in diverse individuals?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,544)
Does personalized cognitive training improve well-being in diverse individuals?
This protocol outlines a machine learning approach to individual-level meta-analysis for personalizing cognitive training to enhance well-being.
Protocol enables personalized cognitive training; leaves open which factors moderate efficacy.
Accumulating evidence suggests that cognitive training may enhance well-being. Yet, mixed findings imply that individual differences and training characteristics may interact to moderate training efficacy. To investigate this possibility, the current paper describes a protocol for a data-driven individual-level meta-analysis study aimed at developing personalized cognitive training. To facilitate comprehensive analysis, this protocol proposes criteria for data search, selection and pre-processing along with the rationale for each decision. Twenty-two cognitive training datasets comprising 1544 participants were collected. The datasets incorporated diverse training methods, all aimed at improving well-being. These training regimes differed in training characteristics such as targeted domain (e.g., working memory, attentional bias, interpretation bias, inhibitory control) and training duration, while participants differed in diagnostic status, age and sex. The planned analyses incorporate machine learning algorithms designed to identify which individuals will be most responsive to cognitive training in general and to discern which methods may be a better fit for certain individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shani et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Well-being (n=1,544). Cognitive training was evaluated on Responsiveness to cognitive training. This protocol describes a planned individual-level meta-analysis using machine learning on 1,544 participants across 22 datasets to identify predictors of responsiveness to cognitive training.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: