Why the study?
Porcine astrovirus type 3 causes polioencephalomyelitis in swine and continues to cause disease in the US swine industry.
The characterization of the genomic structure and conserved antigenic epitopes of novel PoAstV3 strains in the US may aid in the design of vaccine components and diagnostic assays.
Porcine astrovirus type 3 (PoAstV3) has been previously identified as a cause of polioencephalomyelitis in swine and continues to cause disease in the US swine industry. Herein, we describe the characterization of both untranslated regions, frameshifting signal, putative genome-linked virus protein (VPg) and conserved antigenic epitopes of several novel PoAstV3 genomes. Twenty complete coding sequences (CDS) were obtained from 32 diagnostic cases originating from 11 individual farms/systems sharing a nucleotide (amino acid) percent identity of 89.74-100% (94.79-100%), 91.9-100% (96.3-100%) and 90.71-100% (93.51-100%) for ORF1a, ORF1ab and ORF2, respectively. Our results indicate that the 5'UTR of PoAstV3 is highly conserved highlighting the importance of this region in translation initiation while their 3'UTR is moderately conserved among strains, presenting alternative configurations including multiple putative protein binding sites and pseudoknots. Moreover, two predicted conserved antigenic epitopes were identified matching the 3' termini of VP27 of PoAstV3 USA strains. These epitopes may aid in the design and development of vaccine components and diagnostic assays useful to control outbreaks of PoAstV3-associated CNS disease. In conclusion, this is the first analysis predicting the structure of important regulatory motifs of neurotropic mamastroviruses, which differ from those previously described in human astroviruses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferreyra et al. (2021) studied Porcine astrovirus type 3 (PoAstV3) infection (n=32). Porcine astrovirus type 3 (PoAstV3) genomes was evaluated on Nucleotide and amino acid percent identity and genomic characterization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: