Key result
Recirculation length obtained from PIV was 1.47 cm, agreeing within 6.8% and 8.2% of finite-element and finite-volume calculations, respectively.
Why the study?
Accurate quantification of recirculation parameters remains subjective due to uncertainties in measuring velocity and derived wall shear stress.
The accuracy of derived recirculation parameters in stenosis models is highly dependent on the number of near-wall PIV data points and the specific interpolation algorithm utilized.
Validates PIV recirculation measurements in stenosis models; leaves open optimal near-wall sampling and algorithms for clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Recirculation zones within the blood vessels are known to influence the initiation and progression of atherosclerotic lesions. Quantification of recirculation parameters with accuracy remains subjective due to uncertainties in measurement of velocity and derived wall shear stress (WSS). OBJECTIVE: The primary aim is to determine recirculation height and length from PIV experiments while validating with two different numerical methods: finite-element (FE) and -volume (FV). Secondary aim is to analyze how FE and FV compare within themselves. METHODS: PIV measurements were performed to obtain velocity profiles at eight cross sections downstream of stenosis at flow rate of 200 ml/min. WSS was obtained by linear/quadratic interpolation of experimental velocity measurements close to wall. RESULTS: Recirculation length obtained from PIV technique was 1.47 cm and was within 2.2% of previously reported in-vitro measurements. Derived recirculation length from PIV agreed within 6.8% and 8.2% of the FE and FV calculations, respectively. For lower shear rate, linear interpolation with five data points results in least error. For higher shear rate either higher order (quadratic) interpolation with five data points or lower order (linear) with lesser (three) data points leads to better results. CONCLUSION: Accuracy of the recirculation parameters is dependent on number of near wall PIV data points and the type of interpolation algorithm used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2020) studied Moderate stenosis. Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) vs. Finite-element (FE) and finite-volume (FV) methods was evaluated on Recirculation length. Recirculation length obtained from PIV was 1.47 cm, agreeing within 6.8% and 8.2% of finite-element and finite-volume calculations, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: