Key result
A 'steep' pulsatile flow generated substantially greater oscillating wall shear stresses at the proximal and distal branch apex of a 90° femoral artery compared to a 'less-steep' pulse.
Why the study?
Does a steep pulsatile flow compared to a less-steep flow increase oscillating wall shear stresses in a branched artery model?
Does a steep pulsatile flow compared to a less-steep flow increase oscillating wall shear stresses in a branched artery model?
Computational simulation suggests that steep pulsatile flow increases oscillating wall shear stress at arterial branches, potentially contributing to site-specific atherosclerosis.
Hypothesis-generating for pulsatile flow in branch atherosclerosis; leaves open human relevance pending validation.
To validate the pathologoical flow condition as the etiology of site-specific athero sclerosis, computer simulation and analysis are presented. Two extreme pulsatile flows, as have been measured in human femoral arteries, are used to numerically simulate in-vivo blood flow. The pulse with a steep temporal velocity gradient is assigned as “steep” pulse whereas the one with a lesser slope is called “less-steep” pulse. The effect of the extreme two pulses on the injury of endothelial cells in a 90° femoral artery of human is investigated by calculating flow parameters including instantaneous wall shear stresses. At the proximal and the distal branch apex, the oscillating wall shear stresses calculated from the ‘steep’ pulse cycle are found to be substantially greater than those from the ‘less-steep’ one. In contrast, for a straight artery, insignificant changes in flow parameters are observed for the extreme two pulses. It is evident from the calculated local wall shear stress that pathological changes can occur in the intima cells of the branch arterial wall and less likely in the straight arterial wall. An alteration of the pulsatile flow condition from a ‘steep’ to a ‘less-steep’ pulse, as may be achieved by pharmaceutical, chemical, or mechanical means, may be one of the possible ways to reduce the risk, thus slow the progression of or cause regression of arterial diseases, such as heart attack and stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Banerjee et al. (1998) studied Atherosclerosis. Steep pulsatile flow vs. Less-steep pulsatile flow was evaluated on Oscillating wall shear stresses. A 'steep' pulsatile flow generated substantially greater oscillating wall shear stresses at the proximal and distal branch apex of a 90° femoral artery compared to a 'less-steep' pulse.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: