Key result
Simultaneous dual-wire assessment of coronary lesion severity significantly deteriorated the diagnostic performance of FFR, CFVR, and HSR compared to single-wire assessment (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does simultaneous dual wire assessment reduce the diagnostic accuracy of functional parameters of coronary lesion severity compared to sequential single wire assessment in patients with intermediate coronary lesions?
Cross-Sectional (n=65)
Does simultaneous dual wire assessment reduce the diagnostic accuracy of functional parameters of coronary lesion severity compared to sequential single wire assessment in patients with intermediate coronary lesions?
p-value: p=<0.001
The use of two simultaneous intracoronary guidewires overestimates hemodynamically assessed lesion severity, highlighting the advantage of using a single dual-sensor-equipped guidewire for combined pressure and velocity measurements.
May warrant caution with simultaneous dual-wire assessments; leaves open whether single dual-sensor wires improve lesion evaluation.
The aim of this study was to assess the influence of a second guidewire on the diagnostic accuracy of functional parameters of coronary lesion severity. Sixty-five patients with intermediate coronary lesions underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), and hyperemic stenosis resistance (HSR) index (HSR = stenosis pressure gradient / velocity) were determined in 77 lesions. Distal pressure and velocity were acquired simultaneously (dual wire) and sequentially (single wire) with two sensor-equipped guidewires. Overall, functional parameters deteriorated from single- to dual-wire assessment. In patients without ischemia, the good diagnostic performance of FFR, CFVR, and HSR deteriorated significantly (P < 0.001) when assessed by dual wires, with an increase in the number of false-positive results. This trend was more pronounced for HSR, since the presence of a second wire reduced maximal velocity and increased the pressure gradient. The presence of two guidewires, especially across a myocardial perfusion scintigraphy-induced nonsignificant lesion, is associated with overestimation of the hemodynamically assessed lesion severity and, therefore, is likely to have a major impact on clinical decision making. This underscores the advantage of a dual-sensor-equipped guidewire for the evaluation of stenosis severity by combined pressure and velocity measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verberne et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in Intermediate coronary lesions (n=65). Simultaneous intracoronary guidewires (dual wire) vs. Sequential assessment (single wire) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy of functional parameters (FFR, CFVR, HSR) of coronary lesion severity (p=<0.001). Simultaneous dual-wire assessment of coronary lesion severity significantly deteriorated the diagnostic performance of FFR, CFVR, and HSR compared to single-wire assessment (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: