Key result
Among pregnant women treated with nadroparin for recurrent fetal loss, carriers of thrombophilic mutations had a higher live birth rate than those with natural anticoagulant deficiency.
Why the study?
Does prophylactic nadroparin improve pregnancy outcomes equally in pregnant women with recurrent fetal loss regardless of specific thrombophilia type?
Cohort (n=85)
Does prophylactic nadroparin improve pregnancy outcomes equally in pregnant women with recurrent fetal loss regardless of specific thrombophilia type?
Prophylactic nadroparin is highly effective for pregnant women with recurrent fetal loss and thrombophilic mutations, but significantly less effective for those with natural anticoagulant deficiencies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nadroparin outcomes may differ by thrombophilia subtype; leaves open whether deficiency-tailored regimens improve live birth rates.
The study was conducted to evaluate the effect of anticoagulant therapy in women with thrombophilia and to detect the possible differences among carriers of mutations (factor V [FV] Leiden and FIIG20210) and those with natural anticoagulant deficiency. The 4-year prospective investigation included 85 pregnant women, with a history of recurrent fetal loss (RFL). They were treated with prophylactic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin (nadroparin) starting from 6 to 8 weeks of gestation. Pregnancy outcomes were evaluated based on the thrombophilia type. Carriers of thrombophilic mutations had a live birth rate of 93%, compared to 41.6% for women with natural anticoagulant deficiencies. Significant differences between the groups were also observed for intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine growth restriction, and postpartum thrombosis. The optimal therapy for women with natural anticoagulant deficiency and RFL remains unclear and future prospective study with a large number of patients is required to determine the best treatment for these severe thrombophilic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kovač et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Thrombophilia with a history of recurrent fetal loss (RFL) (n=85). Thrombophilic mutations (factor V Leiden and FIIG20210) vs. Natural anticoagulant deficiency was evaluated on Live birth rate. Among pregnant women treated with nadroparin for recurrent fetal loss, carriers of thrombophilic mutations had a higher live birth rate than those with natural anticoagulant deficiency.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: