Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose The aim of this article is to introduce business wargaming as a tool for ex ante strategy evaluation. Reviewing criticism of other approaches, such as scenarios and computer‐based simulations, this article explores whether business wargaming is a suitable response to this criticism. Design/methodology/approach This article reviews and discusses the literature on strategy testing and business wargaming. Findings Business wargaming is capable of responding to criticism of scenarios and computer‐based simulations when applied to the ex ante evaluation of strategy. Business wargaming, which arose from military wargaming, is a strategic simulation that is dynamic and participative, allowing managers to experience how their strategy will compete and endure in their business environment. Research limitations/implications Additional research is needed to explore the application of business wargaming in practice as a tool for the testing of strategy. Practical implications The article suggests that business wargaming is a valuable tool for testing strategies in a simulation, which is participative and dynamic. Originality/value This article fills the research gap on strategy testing and points to a tool – business wargaming – that has been applied intensively in the military field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jan Oliver Schwarz (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: