Key result
Independent measurement of 50 consecutive M-mode echocardiograms by two experienced interpreters demonstrated no significant interobserver variability for all measured parameters.
Why the study?
Is there significant interobserver variability in M-mode echocardiography measurements between experienced interpreters?
Observational (n=50)
Is there significant interobserver variability in M-mode echocardiography measurements between experienced interpreters?
M-mode echocardiography measurements show no significant interobserver variability when performed by experienced interpreters following standardized guidelines.
Left ventricular internal dimensions, septal and posterior wall thickness, aortic root diameter, and left atrial dimensions, were independently measured by two experienced interpreters on 50 consecutive routinely performed M-mode echocardiograms. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the reproducibility of these measurements and to assess if a different "diagnostic effect" could be provided by the two readers. The extent of interobserver variability was calculated and expressed as a percent of the mean. No significant interobserver variability was found for all the measured echocardiographic parameters and the two interpreters gave rise to the same "diagnostic effects." Therefore, the authors suggest following well stated guidelines to provide uniformity in the process of determining the boundaries of the structures to be measured and adjusting the actual measurements by multiplying by a conversion factor (representing the ratio between the number of 1 cm markers and the distance in centimeters between the first and the last marker), as opposed to interpolating between the marks on the recording paper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leonardis et al. (1986) reported an observational. Independent echocardiographic measurements by two interpreters was evaluated on Interobserver variability. Independent measurement of 50 consecutive M-mode echocardiograms by two experienced interpreters demonstrated no significant interobserver variability for all measured parameters.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: