Key result
Compromised pregnant women with an aortic stiffness index above the 95th percentile had a significantly higher prevalence of preeclampsia compared to women with a normal stiffness index (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Is increased maternal abdominal aortic stiffness associated with preeclampsia in compromised pregnancies?
Observational (n=142)
Is increased maternal abdominal aortic stiffness associated with preeclampsia in compromised pregnancies?
p-value: p=<0.001
Stiffness of the abdominal aorta is increased in pregnant women with preeclampsia, suggesting that aberrant hemodynamic adaptation involves larger arteries in addition to small peripheral arteries.
May support aortic stiffness assessment for preeclampsia risk in compromised pregnancies; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical adoption.
A study of 82 normal and 60 compromised pregnant women who were identified by uterine artery Doppler flow waveform systolic/diastolic ratio >95th percentile (increased peripheral resistance) was carried out to examine the elastic properties of the maternal abdominal aorta (AA). An aortic stiffness index (SI) was measured between 18 and 40 weeks at four-weekly intervals with a phase-locked loop ultrasound technique to estimate the aortic systolic and diastolic diameters and their correlation with blood pressure. In the normal group, the aortic systolic and diastolic diameters, as well as the SI, increased with the maternal age. In the compromised group, aortic diameter and blood pressure were normal, but the SI during the early second trimester was increased. Twenty-two women from the compromised group with an SI above the 95th percentile for their age had a significantly higher prevalence of preeclampsia in comparison with women with a normal SI (P<0.001). The aortic SI was significantly higher in severe than in mild preeclampsia. This study demonstrates that stiffness of the AA is increased in pregnant women with preeclampsia and that a progressive increase of the SI in serial studies is associated with severity of the disease. Aberrant hemodynamic adaptation in preeclampsia seems to include increased stiffness of the larger artery besides high resistance in small peripheral arteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uchida et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Compromised pregnancy and preeclampsia (n=142). High aortic stiffness index (SI >95th percentile) vs. Normal aortic stiffness index was evaluated on Prevalence of preeclampsia (p=<0.001). Compromised pregnant women with an aortic stiffness index above the 95th percentile had a significantly higher prevalence of preeclampsia compared to women with a normal stiffness index (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: