Key result
Intra-operative imaging modalities, particularly fusion and ultrasound, effectively detect complications during endovascular aneurysm repair while potentially reducing radiation and contrast doses.
Why the study?
Intra-operative imaging is essential to quality assure EVAR success, but complex interventions carry limitations including longer fluoroscopy times and greater contrast doses.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of different intra-operative imaging modalities used to quality assure endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)?
Systematic Review
What are the advantages and disadvantages of different intra-operative imaging modalities used to quality assure endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)?
Fusion and ultrasound imaging show promise for quality assurance during EVAR by reducing radiation and contrast doses while effectively detecting complications.
Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the preferred method for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. However, the success of this technique depends greatly on the technologies available. Intra-operative imaging is essential but can come with limitations. More complex interventions lead to longer operating times, fluoroscopy times, and greater contrast doses. A number of intra-operative imaging modalities to quality assure the success of EVAR have been developed. A systematic literature search was performed with separate searches conducted for each imaging modality in the study: computed tomography (CT), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), fusion, ultrasound, intra-operative positioning system (IOPS), and non-contrast imaging. CT was effective at detecting complications but commonly resulted in increased radiation and contrast dose. The effectiveness of DSA can be increased, and radiation exposure reduced, through the use of adjunctive technologies. We found that 2D-3D fusion was non-inferior to 3D-3D and led to reduced radiation and contrast dose. Non-contrast imaging occasionally led to higher doses of radiation. Ultrasound was particularly effective in the detection of type II endoleaks with reduced radiation and contrast use but was often operator dependent. Unfortunately, no papers made it past full text screening for IOPS. All of the imaging techniques discussed have advantages and disadvantages, and clinical context is relevant to guide imaging choice. Fusion and ultrasound in particular show promise for the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bachrati et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm undergoing EVAR. Intra-operative imaging modalities (CT, DSA, fusion, ultrasound) vs. Standard imaging or alternative modalities was evaluated on Detection of complications, radiation exposure, and contrast usage. Intra-operative imaging modalities, particularly fusion and ultrasound, effectively detect complications during endovascular aneurysm repair while potentially reducing radiation and contrast doses.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: