Key result
In adults with heparin resistance during VA-ECMO, fresh frozen plasma resulted in 50% survival compared to 10% with increased heparin alone (p=0.07).
Why the study?
The management of heparin resistance in patients undergoing ECMO is uncertain, prompting evaluation of the efficacy and safety of fresh frozen plasma to optimize anticoagulation.
Does fresh frozen plasma improve anticoagulation efficacy and safety compared to incremental heparin in adults with heparin resistance undergoing VA-ECMO?
Cohort (n=42)
Does fresh frozen plasma improve anticoagulation efficacy and safety compared to incremental heparin in adults with heparin resistance undergoing VA-ECMO?
Absolute Event Rate: 50% vs 10%
p-value: p=0.07
Fresh frozen plasma effectively increases ACT to therapeutic targets and reduces heparin requirements in patients with heparin resistance during VA-ECMO, though bleeding complications remain high.
FFP should not yet alter practice in heparin-resistant VA-ECMO; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials.
The management of Heparin resistance in patients undergoing ECMO is still uncertain. We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of Fresh frozen plasma to optimize the anticoagulation in these patients. We studied 42 adults undergoing VA-ECMO. Heparin infusion was increased incrementally to achieve target ACT in HG group and plasma administered in FFPG group in heparin resistance (HR) patients. Statistical comparison was performed between these two groups and results compared with non-heparin resistance (Non-HR) patients. Overall 36% survived and 64% suffered bleeding complications. There was no difference in age (p = 0.118) or average ECMO duration (p = 0.393). The heparin requirement was significantly less in FFPG (p = 0.008) and average ACT difference of 159.2 (20.3) was highly significant (p < 0.001). Clinically the survival was higher in FFPG (50% vs 10%) without statistical difference (p = 0.07) probably due to small sample size. Twenty HR compared to 22 Non-HR patients. The survival rate (41% vs 30%) was not statistically significant (p = 0.340). However, more bleeding 80% vs 50% recorded in HR (p = 0.043) even though heparin doses between them was not different. The heparin requirement was high in patients treated with heparin alone. Fresh frozen plasma effectively increased ACT to therapeutic target in HR patients. There was no difference in the heparin dose, significantly higher bleeding complications were recorded in HR patients. Clinically, survival was better in Non-heparin resistance and plasma treated patients that was not found to be statistically significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khazi et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Heparin resistance during VA-ECMO (n=42). Fresh frozen plasma vs. Increased heparin infusion was evaluated on Survival (p=0.07). In adults with heparin resistance during VA-ECMO, fresh frozen plasma resulted in 50% survival compared to 10% with increased heparin alone (p=0.07).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: