Why the study?
Does targeted ultrasound and echocardiography in high-risk pregnancies improve the prenatal detection rate of congenital heart disease compared to the general population?
Observational
No
Does targeted ultrasound and echocardiography in high-risk pregnancies improve the prenatal detection rate of congenital heart disease compared to the general population?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Concentrating ultrasound and echocardiography expertise on high-risk pregnancies significantly improves the antenatal detection of congenital heart disease compared to screening the general population.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vimercati et al. (2002) conducted an observational in Congenital heart disease (CHD). Recent time period (1998-99) and high-risk status vs. Older time period (1992-93) and general population was evaluated on Prevalence, distribution and prenatal detection rate of congenital heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: