Key result
Carotid intima layer thickness showed greater discriminatory value to identify atherosclerotic plaques (AUC 0.92; 95% CI 0.88-0.96) than media layer thickness or intima-media thickness.
Why the study?
Carotid IMT is influenced by both intima and media thickness, with hypertension potentially stimulating media hypertrophy, but little is known about carotid wall sublayer measures and their association with atherosclerosis in hypertensive subjects.
Does carotid intima layer thickness (IT) correlate better with atherosclerotic plaques than intima-media thickness (IMT) or media thickness (MT) in hypertensive subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=186)
No
Does carotid intima layer thickness (IT) correlate better with atherosclerotic plaques than intima-media thickness (IMT) or media thickness (MT) in hypertensive subjects?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.96)
Carotid intima layer thickness (IT) may be a more accurate marker of atherosclerosis than overall intima-media thickness (IMT) or media thickness (MT) in hypertensive patients.
Distinguishing carotid wall layers may refine atherosclerosis assessment in hypertension; leaves open whether intima thickness improves risk stratification beyond IMT.
Introduction Intimal thickening is a characteristic and initial step of atherosclerosis. Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) is considered a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis, but it can be influenced by increases not only of intima layer thickness (IT), but also of media layer thickness (MT). Hypertension is a risk factor for atherosclerosis, but may also stimulate media layer hypertrophy by increasing artery wall tension. However, little is known regarding the measures of carotid wall sublayers and their association with atherosclerosis in hypertensive subjects. Purpose To measure carotid IMT, MT and IT and evaluate their relationship with carotid atherosclerotic plaques in hypertensive subjects. Methods This cross-sectional study evaluated clinical and carotid characteristics of 186 hypertensive patients (age = 61±11 years, 43% men, BMI = 30.6±6.2 kg/m2) followed at a university outpatient clinic. High-resolution images of common carotid arteries wall and plaques were obtained by ultrasonography equipped with 10MHz-13MHz transducers. IMT, MT and IT were measured using an image processing software. Results Mean IT, MT and IMT values were 0.267±0.060, 0.475±0.107 and 0.742±0.142 mm, respectively. IMT showed stronger correlation with MT (r=0.92; p<0.001) than with IT (r=0.72; p<0.001). Patients with carotid plaques (n=100; 58% of the sample) had higher age (p<0.001) and carotid diastolic diameter (p=0.002) and a trend toward higher diabetes prevalence (p=0.06) than those without plaques. In logistic regression analysis adjusted for these variables, plaques showed stronger association with IT than with MT and IMT (Figure 1). In addition, IT showed greater area under the ROC curve (0.92; 95% CI 0.88–0.96) than IMT (0.79; 95% CI 0.72–0.85) and MT (0.64; 95% CI 0,56–0,72) to identify plaques. Conclusions MT is the main determinant of carotid IMT in hypertensive subjects. Conversely, IT showed stronger correlation and greater discriminatory value to identify atherosclerotic plaques than MT and IMT. These findings suggest that carotid IT may be a more accurate marker of atherosclerosis that MT or IMT in hypertensive subjects. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): CNPq
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carvalho-Romano et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=186). Carotid intima layer thickness (IT) vs. Media layer thickness (MT) and intima-media thickness (IMT) was evaluated on Presence of carotid atherosclerotic plaques (AUC 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.96). Carotid intima layer thickness showed greater discriminatory value to identify atherosclerotic plaques (AUC 0.92; 95% CI 0.88-0.96) than media layer thickness or intima-media thickness.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: