In this controlled study, we compared clonidine with conventional premedication in 35 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).After premedication with clonidine 5 [micro sign]g/kg PO (Group C, n = 11), lorazepam 60 [micro sign]g/kg PO (Group L, n = 13), or morphine 0.1 mg/kg plus scopolamine 6 [micro sign]g/kg IM (Group M, n = 11), sedation, anxiety, and quality of premedication were graded. After the administration of sufentanil 2.0 [micro sign]g/kg over 12.5 min, a computer-assisted infusion device targeted a sufentanil effect-site concentration of 0.75 ng/mL. Hemodynamic variables, end-tidal isoflurane concentration (ET-ISO), the electroencephalographic spectral edge, and the serum sufentanil concentration (SUF) were measured. There were no intergroup differences in anxiety, sedation, quality of premedication, the dose of sufentanil causing unconsciousness, or the electroencephalographic (EEG) response to induction. Intraoperative SUF was stable, with no intergroup difference. The average prebypass ET-ISO was lower in Group C than in Group M. The ET-ISO and peak ET-ISO after intense surgical stimulation were lower in Group C versus Groups L and M. Mean arterial blood pressure was lower in Group C versus Groups L and M. There were no intergroup differences in pharmacologic intervention, time to extubation, or intensive care unit stay. Clonidine produces sedation, anxiolysis, and quality of premedication comparable to conventional premedication. Compared with other drugs, clonidine does not alter the dose of sufentanil inducing unconsciousness or EEG slowing, but it uniquely reduces isoflurane requirements. Implications: In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, clonidine produces sedation and relieves anxiety as effectively as conventional premedication. Clonidine does not uniquely alter the dose of sufentanil inducing unconsciousness or electroencephalographic slowing, but it significantly reduces isoflurane requirements. (Anesth Analg 1998;87:292-9)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomson et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: