Key result
Spinal anaesthesia did not influence the post-operative decline in mental function or subjective physical well-being compared to general anaesthesia in elderly men following urological surgery.
Why the study?
Does spinal anaesthesia improve post-operative mental function and subjective physical well-being compared to general anaesthesia in elderly male patients following urological surgery?
RCT (n=94)
Does spinal anaesthesia improve post-operative mental function and subjective physical well-being compared to general anaesthesia in elderly male patients following urological surgery?
The type of anaesthesia (spinal vs general) does not influence the short-term post-operative decline in mental function and subjective physical well-being in elderly men undergoing urological surgery.
Spinal or general anaesthesia may be chosen without regard to mental function or well-being outcomes; confirms equivalence in elderly men after urological surgery.
Standardized behavioural observations were used to establish the influence of the type of anaesthesia on the mental function and the subjective physical well-being in 60 patients, all men, following urological surgery. The patients were randomized to two groups, receiving spinal or general anaesthesia. For evaluation of the influence of pre-operative physical condition on post-operative mental function, a supplementary group of 34 patients with pre-existing cardiovascular and/or pulmonary disorders was included in the study. These patients all received spinal anaesthesia. The patients were observed from the day before surgery until 4 weeks after. In all patients a short-lasting temporary decline in mental function was observed. The outcome was not influenced by the type of anaesthesia. In the two groups receiving spinal anaesthesia the decline in post-operative mental function and subjective sense of well-being was most pronounced in patients with a compromised physical condition pre-operatively. Four weeks after surgery, no signs of mental deterioration were present; however, the subjective sense of physical well-being had not fully returned.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crul et al. (1992) conducted an RCT in Urological surgery (n=94). Spinal anaesthesia vs. General anaesthesia was evaluated on Post-operative subjective physical well-being and mental function. Spinal anaesthesia did not influence the post-operative decline in mental function or subjective physical well-being compared to general anaesthesia in elderly men following urological surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: