Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Indirect evaporative cooling (IEC) provides a zero-refrigerant route to space cooling, achieving coefficients of performance (COP) far above those of conventional vapor-compression systems. Yet the combined influence of water-side operating conditions on cross-flow IEC performance under condensing conditions has not been adequately characterized. This study extends existing cross-flow IEC models in two respects: (i) the condensation criterion is evaluated cell-by-cell across a two-dimensional grid, removing the need for any prior assumption on condensation zone extent, and (ii) a fourth-order Runge–Kutta spatial-marching scheme captures the diagonal condensation boundary with a precision beyond that of first-order finite-difference approaches. These capabilities are applied for the first time to a systematic parametric study of water-side operating conditions, covering 31 cases across secondary inlet temperature (21–31°C), spray density (0.002–0.010 kg s⁻¹ m⁻¹), and water inlet temperature (20–30°C). The model was validated against published wet-bulb effectiveness data at three flow-rate ratios, giving RMSE of 0.005–0.008 kg kg⁻¹ and R² of 0.52–0.95. Results indicate the condensation zone spans 42% of the plate area but contributes 38% of total heat removal, with a peak driving force of +5.1°C; primary-air temperature drop falls by 34.1% as secondary inlet temperature increases from 21 to 31°C; and spray-density benefits plateau beyond 0.006 kg s⁻¹ m⁻¹. A Pareto-optimal operating frontier (Ts,i = 22–24°C, Γ = 0.004–0.006 kg s⁻¹ m⁻¹, Tw,i = 20–22°C) yields εWB = 70–76% and COP = 85–130, while the spray-density saturation threshold identifies the economic limit of water consumption beyond which additional spray provides negligible performance benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: