Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The peculiar central compact object 1E 1207.4−5209 in the G296.5+10.0 supernova remnant has been proposed to be an “anti-magnetar” – a young neutron star born with a weak dipole field. Accretion, possibly of supernova fallback material, has also been invoked to explain a large surface temperature anisotropy as well as the generation of peculiar cyclotron absorption features superimposed on its thermal spectrum. Interestingly enough, a faint optical/infrared source was proposed as a possible counterpart to 1E 1207.4−5209, but later questioned, based on coarse positional coincidence. On the basis of the large offset of 1E 1207.4−5209 with respect to the center of its host supernova remnant, the source should move at ~70 mas yr-1. Thus, we tested the association by measuring the proper motion of the proposed optical counterpart. Using Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observations spanning 3.75 years, we computed a 3σ upper limit of 7 mas yr-1. Absolute astrometry on the same HST data set also places the optical source significantly off the 99% confidence Chandra position. This allows us to safely rule out the association. Using the HST data set, coupled to ground-based observations collected at the ESO/Very Large Telescope (VLT), we set the deepest limits ever obtained on the optical/infrared emission from 1E 1207.4−5209. By combining these limits with the constraints derived from X-ray timing, we rule out accretion as the source of the thermal anisotropy of the neutron star.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luca et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: