Key result
A novel automatic intraoperative blood loss monitor accurately measured simulated blood loss, with percentage errors of 5.2% for free blood and -5.7% to -6.6% for surgical sponges.
Why the study?
Accurate real-time surgical blood loss monitoring is essential for intraoperative safety, but no standard assessment method currently exists.
Does a new automatic intraoperative blood loss monitor accurately measure blood volume in free blood and surgical sponges compared to physical measurements?
Does a new automatic intraoperative blood loss monitor accurately measure blood volume in free blood and surgical sponges compared to physical measurements?
A novel automatic intraoperative blood loss monitor demonstrates high accuracy and precision in measuring free blood and sponge blood volumes in an in vitro model.
May support real-time surgical blood loss monitoring; leaves open need for validation trials before adoption.
Introduction: Accurate and real-time monitoring of surgical blood loss is essential for ensuring intraoperative safety. However, there is currently no standard way to assess the amount of blood lost in patients during surgery. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy and precision of a new automatic intraoperative blood loss monitor, which can measure both free blood volume and blood content in sponges in real time. Methods: The monitor uses an integrated photoelectric probe to gauge hemoglobin levels in both free blood and blood taken from surgical sponges. These data, combined with initial hemoglobin levels, are processed using specific calculations to determine blood volume. We created 127 diverse free blood samples and 160 blood-containing sponge samples by using fresh pig blood and physiological saline. The monitor then measured these samples. We subsequently compared its measurements with actual values acquired through physical measurements, detecting both agreement and measurement errors. Repeated measurements were performed to calculate the coefficient of variation, thereby evaluating the monitor's precision. Results: The estimated blood loss percentage error of the monitor was 5.2% for free blood, -5.7% for small sponge, -6.3% for medium sponge, and -6.6% for large sponge. The coefficient of variation of free blood with different hemoglobin concentrations measured by the monitor was less than 10%. Bland-Altman analysis showed that the limits of agreement between the monitor and the reference method were all within the acceptable clinical range. Conclusion: The new automatic intraoperative blood loss monitor is an accurate and reliable device for monitoring both free blood and surgical sponge blood, and shows high performance under various clinical simulation conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2023) studied Surgical blood loss (n=287). Automatic intraoperative blood loss monitor vs. Physical measurements (reference method) was evaluated on Estimated blood loss percentage error. A novel automatic intraoperative blood loss monitor accurately measured simulated blood loss, with percentage errors of 5.2% for free blood and -5.7% to -6.6% for surgical sponges.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: