AIMS: To obtain pharmacokinetic data for artesunate (ARTS) and its active metabolite dihydroartemisinin (DHA) following i.m. ARTS and rectal DHA administration. METHODS: Twelve Vietnamese patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria were randomized to receive either i.v. or i.m. ARTS (120 mg), with the alternative preparation given 8 h later in an open crossover design. A further 12 patients were given i.v. ARTS (120 mg) at 0 h and rectal DHA (160 mg) 8 h later. RESULTS: Following i.v. bolus, ARTS had a peak concentration of 42 microm (16 mg l(-1), elimination t1/2 = 3.2 min, CL = 2.8 l h(-1) kg(-1) and V = 0.22 l kg(-1) . The Cmax for DHA was 9.7 microm (2.7 mg l(-1) ), t1/2 = 59 min, CL = 0.64 l h(-1) kg(-1) and V = 0.8 l kg(-1) . Following i.m. ARTS, Cmax was 2.3 microm (3.7 mg l(-1)), the apparent t1/2 = 41 min, CL = 2.9 l h(-1) kg(-1) and V = 2.6 l kg(-1). The relative bioavailability of DHA was 88%, Cmax was 4.1 microm (1.16 mg l(-1)) and t1/2 = 64 min. In the rectal DHA study, relative bioavailability of DHA was 16%. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria i.m. ARTS is a suitable alternative to i.v. ARTS, at equal doses. To achieve plasma DHA concentrations equivalent to parenteral administration of ARTS, rectal DHA should be given at approximately four-fold higher milligram doses. Further studies are needed to determine whether these recommendations can be applied to patients with severe malaria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ilett et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: