Key result
Melitor (agomelatine) improved psychic-emotional activity, cerebral hemodynamics, and brain bioelectric activity in 30 patients with post-stroke depression.
Why the study?
Does agomelatine improve psychic-emotional activity and cerebral hemodynamics in patients with post-stroke depression?
Does agomelatine improve psychic-emotional activity and cerebral hemodynamics in patients with post-stroke depression?
Agomelatine may improve functional and psychic-emotional states, as well as cerebral hemodynamics, in patients recovering from post-stroke depression.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Agomelatine may benefit post-stroke depression; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Aim: This study focused on the Melitor (agomelatine) effects on the psychic-emotional activity, cerebral hemodynamic and bioelectrical activity of the brain in the patients with post-stroke depression. Patients: Thirty patients with post-stroke depression were treated with Melitor in the dose of 25 mg daily during two months. Results: Treated with Melitor, the study patients suffering from post-stroke depression showed positive drug effect on the psychic-emotional activity, improvement of cerebral hemodynamic and harmonization of the brain bioelectric activity. In the patients with right-versus left-hemispheric stroke, Melitor had more pronounced effect on the cerebral hemodynamic bioelectric activity of the brain. Owing to its multimodal action, the Melitor is recommended for the patients during their recovery after stroke in the sense of improving their functional and psychic-emotional state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuznetsova Sm (2017) studied post-stroke depression (n=30). Melitor (agomelatine) was evaluated on Psychic-emotional activity, cerebral hemodynamic and bioelectrical activity of the brain. Melitor (agomelatine) improved psychic-emotional activity, cerebral hemodynamics, and brain bioelectric activity in 30 patients with post-stroke depression.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: