Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper describes the use of patterned self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) in area-selective deposition of conducting polymers (polypyrrole and polyaniline) on insulating, hydroxyl-terminated surfaces such as Si/SiO 2 and glass. Patterned SAMs of octadecylsiloxane were generated on the hydroxyl-terminated surfaces using microcontact printing; they defined and directed the deposition of conducting polymers. The rate of deposition on the hydrophobic surface is higher than that on the hydrophilic surface: immersion of a substrate patterned with a methyl-terminated SAM in an appropriate aqueous polymerization bath produced a “positive” pattern of the conducting polymer on the surface. The conducting polymer deposited on the hydrophobic region of a surface completely covered by the polymer could be readily removed by transferring it to adhesive tape to form a “positive” pattern on the tape, leaving a “negative” pattern on the surface of the substrate. The conducting polymer deposited on the hydrophobic surface had a more extended conformation, and thus a higher conductivity (approximately 3 orders of magnitude in difference), than that formed on the hydrophilic surface. The smallest features of conducting polymers generated using these procedures were ∼2 μm in lateral dimension. The edge roughness of these patterns was ∼0.5 μm. These patterned microstructures of conducting polymers were conductive; they have been used as electrodes in display devices based on polymer dispersed liquid crystals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: