Key result
A quality improvement program aimed at increasing adherence to VTE prophylaxis guidelines in patients with multiple myeloma reduced VTE events from 10% at baseline to 4% at follow-up, though this was not statistically significant.
Why the study?
Patients with multiple myeloma are at elevated risk of venous thromboembolism, but physician adherence to VTE prevention guidelines is low.
Does a quality improvement and education program reduce VTE events and improve guideline adherence in patients with multiple myeloma?
Observational (n=200)
No
Does a quality improvement and education program reduce VTE events and improve guideline adherence in patients with multiple myeloma?
Absolute Event Rate: 4% vs 10%
A quality improvement program in a cancer center improved awareness and guideline-based VTE prophylaxis in multiple myeloma patients, with a non-significant trend toward reduced VTE events.
QI program may raise VTE prophylaxis adherence in myeloma; leaves open impact on clinical events.
Patients with multiple myeloma are at elevated risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), the second leading cause of death in patients with cancer, but physician adherence to VTE prevention guidelines is low. Several organizations partnered in designing and implementing a 2-year quality improvement (QI) program in a tertiary care/academic cancer center, to increase awareness of VTE prophylaxis for patients with multiple myeloma and thus improve adherence to prophylaxis guidelines and protocols. The QI arm included 2 chart audits, conducted 2 years apart, of unmatched cohorts of 100 patients with multiple myeloma. An Education arm included 2 grand rounds presentations, 3 web-based case discussions, and a patient education module. Twenty providers took part in the continuous QI arm. More than 1100 learners participated in the online cases; the patient education curriculum reached 112 multiple myeloma patients. The initiative proved helpful in defining barriers to guideline adherence and identifying data-driven practice improvement strategies for VTE prophylaxis. It also increased learner awareness of VTE guidelines, patient risk stratification, and optimal thromboprophylaxis strategies. There was a reduction in VTE events (primary clinical outcome) from 10% at baseline to 4% in the follow-up cohort, although this was not statistically significant. Higher rates of guideline-based prophylaxis were observed in low-risk patients, and a lower incidence of VTE was observed in multiple myeloma patients with a prior history of VTE. Additional research is needed to refine prophylaxis guidelines. With appropriate institutional support, this type of QI program can be readily adopted by other organizations to address practice improvement needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baz et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Multiple myeloma (n=200). Quality improvement educational program for VTE prophylaxis vs. Baseline cohort (pre-intervention) was evaluated on Incidence of VTE events within 6 months of data collection. A quality improvement program aimed at increasing adherence to VTE prophylaxis guidelines in patients with multiple myeloma reduced VTE events from 10% at baseline to 4% at follow-up, though this was not statistically significant.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: