Key result
Simple pericardiocentesis for NSCLC-related pericardial effusion resulted in a significantly shorter median recurrence-free survival (1.67 months) compared to balloon pericardiotomy (5.03 months) and surgical pericardiectomy (8.32 months).
Why the study?
It was unknown whether different invasive interventions for pericardial effusion in lung cancer patients result in different survival outcomes.
Do balloon pericardiotomy and surgical pericardiectomy improve recurrence-free survival compared to simple pericardiocentesis in patients with NSCLC-related pericardial effusion?
Cohort (n=244)
No
Do balloon pericardiotomy and surgical pericardiectomy improve recurrence-free survival compared to simple pericardiocentesis in patients with NSCLC-related pericardial effusion?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.67% vs 5.03%
p-value: p=0.008
In patients with NSCLC-related pericardial effusion, balloon pericardiotomy and surgical pericardiectomy are associated with longer recurrence-free survival compared to simple pericardiocentesis.
Simple pericardiocentesis was associated with shorter RFS in NSCLC pericardial effusion; leaves open optimal procedure choice pending prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer with related pericardial effusion is not rare. Intervention is a crucial step for symptomatic effusion. It is unknown, however, whether the different invasive interventions for pericardial effusion result in different survival outcomes. This study analyzed the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have undergone different procedures. METHODS: From January 2006 to June 2018, we collected data from patients with NSCLC who have received invasive intervention for pericardial effusions. The patients were divided into three categories: simple pericardiocentesis, balloon pericardiotomy, and surgical pericardiectomy. Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test were used to analyze the pericardial effusion recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 244 patients were enrolled. Adenocarcinoma (83.6%) was the major NSCLC subtype. Invasive intervention, including simple pericardiocentesis, balloon pericardiotomy, and surgical pericardiectomy, had been carried out on 52, 170, and 22 patients, respectively. The 1-year RFS rates in simple pericardiocentesis, balloon pericardiotomy, and surgical pericardiectomy were 19.2%, 31.2%, and 31.8%, respectively (P = 0.128), and the median RFS was 1.67, 5.03, and 8.32 months, respectively (P = 0.008). There was no significant difference in OS, however, with the median OS at 1.67, 6.43, and 8.32 months, respectively (P = 0.064). According to the multivariable analysis, the gravity in pericardial fluid analysis, receiving systemic therapy after pericardial effusion, and the time period from stage IV lung cancer to the presence of pericardial effusion were independent prognostic factors for pericardial effusion RFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have undergone simple pericardiocentesis alone for the management of NSCLC-related pericardial effusion have lower 1-year RFS rates than those who have undergone balloon pericardiotomy and surgical pericardiectomy. Therefore, balloon pericardiotomy and surgical pericardiectomy should be carried out for patients with NSCLC-related pericardial effusion if tolerable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with pericardial effusion (n=244). Simple pericardiocentesis vs. Balloon pericardiotomy or surgical pericardiectomy was evaluated on Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) in months (p=0.008). Simple pericardiocentesis for NSCLC-related pericardial effusion resulted in a significantly shorter median recurrence-free survival (1.67 months) compared to balloon pericardiotomy (5.03 months) and surgical pericardiectomy (8.32 months).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: